Final Words

In almost every test of our review, we discovered the Fuji FinePix A330 to offer the best performance of the group. In terms of speed, it has a fast startup time and very little shutter lag. Although the Shot to Shot w/Flash times are rather slow, without the flash, it is able to shoot the fastest of the bunch without filling its buffer. It proved to have the highest overall resolution and longest battery life.

In comparison, both the Kodak CX7330 and Olympus D-540 were slow in starting up. Although the Kodak camera can nearly keep up with the Fuji A330 from Shot to Shot, it starts to drag after 3 consecutive frames. In addition, although the Kodak and Olympus cameras have the advantage of a continuous drive mode, the benefits are questionable considering the long buffer clearing times. The Kodak CX7330 has a couple of advantages over the other cameras. For example, its Auto WB setting is actually pretty accurate. Also, the CX7330 is the only camera from this group that can record audio with its video clips.

The Olympus camera is absolutely horrendous in basically all the timing tests. The fact that it takes over 9 seconds between shots without the flash is obscene. When the flash is used, waiting 17 seconds between shots is also unacceptable. We were also disappointed with its shutter lag (with auto-focus) performance. When the camera is pre-focused, the lag isn't too bad. However, when auto-focusing is added to the equation, the camera really takes a while locking focus and shooting. There are some good things about the D-540. The movie mode is unlimited and allows use of the optical zoom, white balance, and exposure compensation. Also, the D-540 can take macro pictures as close as 0.8 in. from the lens.

The most important aspect of a digital camera review is obviously image quality. We were surprised to find that despite the differences in our other tests, all three cameras were able to produce pretty good looking pictures. All three cameras consistently took pictures that were well-exposed and well-saturated. The differences between the cameras are subtle, but important. For example, upon close inspection, we discovered that both the Kodak CX7330 and the Olympus D-540 used high levels of in-camera sharpening. This results in the appearance of jaggies along fine lines. In the case of the Kodak camera, we also found very visible JPEG artifacts - evidence of over-compression. Even at the highest quality setting, the Kodak CX7330 over-compresses its images in an attempt to lower the file sizes. In contrast to both the jaggy and over-compression issues, we found the Fuji A330 to produce smooth and detailed images.

Overall, we chose the Fuji FinePix A330 over the Kodak and Olympus cameras because of a combination of its speed and image quality performances. Our second choice would probably be the Kodak CX7330 because, despite its JPEG artifacts and jaggies, the camera is much faster than the Olympus. The image quality of these entry-level digicams is getting very impressive. For only $150, it is now possible to buy a digital camera and easily make beautiful 8x10 prints from the images.

 Fuji FinePix A330
 Pros  Cons
Fast startup time
Bright and colorful daylight pictures
High resolution
Very little shutter lag
Smooth, but detailed, images
Outstanding battery life
Slow Shot to Shot w/Flash time
No continuous drive
Limited video clip duration
Mediocre auto WB in tungsten light

 Kodak EasyShare CX7330
 Pros  Cons
Fast shot to shot w/flash time
Accurate Auto WB in tungsten light
Video clips are unlimited and w/sound
Decent battery life
Slow startup time
Below-average resolution
Relatively slow lag time (w/auto-focus)
Jaggies (over-sharpening)
JPEG artifacts from high compression

 Olympus D-540
 Pros  Cons
Superb Super Macro mode
Decent resolution
Video clips have unlimited duration
Video mode allows use of optical zoom
Decent battery life
Very slow startup time
Very slow shot to shot w/flash time
Poor Auto WB in tungsten light
Very slow lag time (w/auto-focus)
Jaggies (over-sharpening)
No TV-out

Thanks again to Newegg.com for loaning us the Kodak EasyShare CX7330.

General Image Quality
Comments Locked

16 Comments

View All Comments

  • Jeff7181 - Friday, December 31, 2004 - link

    Nice article... would have been nice to see it BEFORE the holidays though ;)
  • stephencaston - Friday, December 31, 2004 - link

    #4,

    Unfortunately, when it comes to digital cameras, it is impossible to cover every camera at a specific price point. We had to make choices when picking which cameras to use and ended up choosing three cameras at $150 with very similar features to make the comparisons more relevant.

    I did not mean to imply that this article will determine the best camera at $150. The article was meant to compare these three cameras to each other. I have amended the title accordingly to reflect this.

    We always encourage people to do as much research as possible before buying a camera. There are so many different things to consider when reviewing digital cameras and each review site focuses on different areas.
  • PrinceGaz - Friday, December 31, 2004 - link

    I'd take the Minolta DiMAGE X31 over any of the cameras reviewed any day; it's a lot more compact than them which is what many people desire when out and about, is reported to give a good picture for it's price and size, has lots of features, and at $150 is just as cheap as them. My DiMAGE X20 is a lovely little camera that does everything you could ask of it, and from what I've read the X31 makes a good thing better.

    I will reiterate a point I made when digicam reviews first appeared on AT, which is that unless you can review *every* model in depth to find which is the best in that category, then you are doing a dis-service to your readers by potentially not even looking at what might be the best camera in that range.

    Specialist digicam websites review all cameras so that they can give an informed opinion on any new models, even if that means buying one themselves like AT might do for a computer product that free review samples weren't available for. What AT is doing with digicam reviews is just picking two or three models out of the many available and saying one of them is the best, when better ones you didn't even look at are available. AT does excellent reviews of computer components, but I'm afraid you'd have to be a fool to only use your recommendations when buying a digicam.
  • orenb - Friday, December 31, 2004 - link

    The best digital camera at this price point is the Ricoh Caplio RX. 28-100mm zoom. Metal body. Almost no shutter lag. These three don't even come close.

    Prog.
  • Joony - Friday, December 31, 2004 - link

    The Canon A400 should be in this review...
  • cosmotic - Thursday, December 30, 2004 - link

    Again, Kodak EasyShare is turned into an ad link and blends into the background of the table cell.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now