Gaming Performance

For Intel's Z97 and Z170 platform, the issue of FCLK settings might play a big role here. At launch, the default setting for the communication buffer between the CPU and PCIe stack was 800 MHz, even though Intel suggested 1000 MHz, but this was because of firmware limitations from Intel. Since then, there is firmware to enable 1000 MHz, and most motherboard manufacturers have this - but it is unclear if the motherboard will default to 1000 MHz and it might vary from BIOS version to BIOS version. As we test at default settings, our numbers are only ever snapshots in time, but it leads to some interesting differences in discrete GPU performance.

The gaming tests in our motherboard reviews aremore of a checkbox for abnormal behavior, as with the CPU tests, to make sure nothing fishy is going on.

Total War: Attila

The Total War franchise moves on to Attila, another The Creative Assembly development, and is a stand-alone strategy title set in 395AD where the main storyline lets the gamer take control of the leader of the Huns in order to conquer parts of the world. Graphically the game can render hundreds/thousands of units on screen at once, all with their individual actions and can put some of the big cards to task.

For low-end graphics, we test at 720p with performance settings, recording the average frame rate. With mid and high range graphics, we test at 1080p with the quality setting. In both circumstances, unlimited video memory is enabled and the in-game scripted benchmark is used.

Total War: Attila on NVIDIA GTX 770 2GB ($245)

GRID: Autosport

No graphics tests are complete without some input from Codemasters and the EGO engine, which means for this round of testing we point towards GRID: Autosport, the next iteration in the GRID and racing genre. As with our previous racing testing, each update to the engine aims to add in effects, reflections, detail, and realism, with Codemasters making ‘authenticity’ a main focal point for this version.

GRID’s benchmark mode is very flexible and, as a result, we created a test race using a shortened version of the Red Bull Ring with twelve cars doing two laps. The car is focus starts last and is quite fast, but usually finishes second or third. For low-end graphics, we test at 1080p medium settings, whereas mid and high-end graphics get the full 1080p maximum. Both the average and minimum frame rates are recorded.

GRID: Autosport on NVIDIA GTX 770 2GB ($245)

GRID: Autosport on NVIDIA GTX 770 2GB ($245)

 

CPU Performance, Short Form Final Words & Conclusion
Comments Locked

19 Comments

View All Comments

  • jabbadap - Tuesday, September 5, 2017 - link

    Erhm Your spec table says "Onboard M.2 none", yet there is one m.2 slot behind the motherboard if I'm not mistaken.

    Interesting little guy, though I would not OC with that tiny vrm heatsinks it has.
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, September 5, 2017 - link

    Thanks!

    (There are actually 2, one on top and one on the underside of the board)
  • jtd871 - Tuesday, September 5, 2017 - link

    Thanks for the review.

    The lustre on the 200-series is wearing a bit thin, however, with Intel wooing consumers with the next-gen CPUs and chipset, so I'm not surprised to see some manufacturers trying to drum up a bit of business to move some inventory.

    I've always been a bit confused as to why motherboard manufacturers appear to cheap out on their mITX offerings (since mATX and mITX would seem to be better suited to the capabilities of the Z-series chipsets with the inherent limitations on PCI lanes than full ATX or E-ATX boards).

    Notes to mobo manufacturers and designers, here are some ideas on how to differentiate your product to consumers (other than price):
    1) Don't cheap out on the audio codec. Use the latest and greatest.
    2) If you're offering a Z-series chipset, include the power phases and connectors requires to overclock the top-of the line CPU SKU for the chipset, and choose heatsinks based on performance rather than looks.
    3) Consider dropping the number of SATA connections to 2: mITX systems generally don't run more than 2 SATA drives, and many these days just run a NVMe drive. Of the SATA connections you do offer, make them RAID-able. Use the freed-up HSIO lanes for more the latest I/O connectors.
    4) Especially for mITX, use the physically smallest I/O connectors practical and locate them, or at least 1 of each type, where a full-length PCIe card won't obstruct them.
    5) Include diagnostic LEDs (or even a separate diagnostic PCB that connects to a header on your board?) (to save space).
    6) Shamelessly copy (and, by all means, improve on) the best and most innovative features of your competitors' boards and BIOS.
    7) Read your product's reviews. Especially the critical ones.
  • Brianmmm - Monday, September 18, 2017 - link

    Maybe you're thinking of something like this? I have one, it rocks.

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/9854/asus-maximus-vi...
  • nathanddrews - Tuesday, September 5, 2017 - link

    I got really excited when I saw "Durathon" because I thought it was some new AMD chip I didn't know about.
  • MajGenRelativity - Tuesday, September 5, 2017 - link

    Return of the Duron?
  • artk2219 - Tuesday, September 5, 2017 - link

    You joke but i'd love to see that. Maybe name the new Raven Ridge APU's with failed GPU's Durons instead of athlons? Probably not, since sempron took Durons place, but i wouldnt mind it :).
  • BrokenCrayons - Tuesday, September 5, 2017 - link

    Eh, I know it's interesting and sometimes fun to overclock, but the performance benefit is typically insignificant without water cooling or a very large air cooler. Both of those cooling setups demand physical space so they increase the size of the system and that takes away some of the point in getting a Mini-ITX motherboard in the first place. ECS might be touting it as a feature, but I can't see it being a key selling point to even the small form factor gamer audience targeted by this motherboard. It probably doesn't matter much that its a rather limited capability of the board.
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, September 5, 2017 - link

    As I've observed before, the MITX mobo form factor is trying to serve two masters with different needs, desires, and general system configurations.

    The first - and who the form factor was originally created for - are people who want as small of a system as possible (but who don't find the NUC/etc compelling for whatever reason). For these people, you're right that any OC feature is likely to be unused. However they're not who it's being intended for.

    The second group of people building mITX are conventional gamers who've decided that other than a single GPU they have zero need of PCIe expansion slots, and thus no need for a larger mATX/ATX motherboard. They're still building conventional gamer type systems with a large enough PSU and sufficient cooling to consider an OC because they're using cases only a few inches smaller than what would be normal with an mATX build.
  • btmedic04 - Wednesday, September 6, 2017 - link

    Im surprised ECS is still around. I haven't used one of their products since the G45/intel pentium dual core system I put together for my dad way back when.

    As for the overclocking options, I could see them possibly being useful in an undervolting/underclocking scenario (say a passive build) or paired with a pentium g3258-like processor (please intel! the i3 7350k is overpriced for what it is)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now